Changeset fd54fef for libcfa/src/containers/pair.cfa

Timestamp:

Jan 19, 2021, 8:44:29 PM (3 years ago)

Author:

Michael Brooks <mlbrooks@…>

Branches:

ADT, arm-eh, ast-experimental, enum, forall-pointer-decay, jacob/cs343-translation, master, new-ast-unique-expr, pthread-emulation, qualifiedEnum

Children:

dafbde8

Parents:

2f47ea4

Message:

Converting the project to use the new syntax for otype, dtype and ttytpe.

Changed prelude (gen), libcfa and test suite to use it. Added a simple deprecation rule of the old syntax to the parser; we might wish to support both syntaxes "officially," like with an extra CLI switch, but this measure should serve as a simple reminder for our team to try the new syntax.

File:

• libcfa/src/containers/pair.cfa (modified) (4 diffs)

libcfa/src/containers/pair.cfa

@@ -13 +13 @@
 #include <containers/pair.hfa>
 
-forall(otype R, otype S
+forall(R, S
         | { int ?==?(R, R); int ?<?(R, R); int ?<?(S, S); })
 int ?<?(pair(R, S) p, pair(R, S) q) {
@@ -19 +19 @@
 }
 
-forall(otype R, otype S
+forall(R, S
         | { int ?==?(R, R); int ?<?(R, R); int ?<=?(S, S); })
 int ?<=?(pair(R, S) p, pair(R, S) q) {
@@ -25 +25 @@
 }
 
-forall(otype R, otype S | { int ?==?(R, R); int ?==?(S, S); })
+forall(R, S | { int ?==?(R, R); int ?==?(S, S); })
 int ?==?(pair(R, S) p, pair(R, S) q) {
         return p.first == q.first && p.second == q.second;
 }
 
-forall(otype R, otype S | { int ?!=?(R, R); int ?!=?(S, S); })
+forall(R, S | { int ?!=?(R, R); int ?!=?(S, S); })
 int ?!=?(pair(R, S) p, pair(R, S) q) {
         return p.first != q.first || p.second != q.second;
 }
 
-forall(otype R, otype S
+forall(R, S
         | { int ?==?(R, R); int ?>?(R, R); int ?>?(S, S); })
 int ?>?(pair(R, S) p, pair(R, S) q) {
@@ -41 +41 @@
 }
 
-forall(otype R, otype S
+forall(R, S
         | { int ?==?(R, R); int ?>?(R, R); int ?>=?(S, S); })
 int ?>=?(pair(R, S) p, pair(R, S) q) {