Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 6, 2023, 3:44:40 PM (10 months ago)
Author:
JiadaL <j82liang@…>
Branches:
master
Children:
01510fe
Parents:
4894239 (diff), 4a40fca7 (diff)
Note: this is a merge changeset, the changes displayed below correspond to the merge itself.
Use the (diff) links above to see all the changes relative to each parent.
Message:

Merge branch 'master' of plg.uwaterloo.ca:software/cfa/cfa-cc

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • doc/theses/colby_parsons_MMAth/text/intro.tex

    r4894239 rf3f009f  
    1616All of these features exist in other programming languages in some shape or form, however this thesis extends the original ideas by improving performance, productivity, and safety.
    1717
     18\section{The Need For Concurrent Features}
     19Asking a programmer to write a complex concurrent program without any concurrent language features is asking them to undertake a very difficult task.
     20They would only be able to rely on the atomicity that their hardware provides and would have to build up from there.
     21This would be like asking a programmer to write a complex sequential program only in assembly.
     22Both are doable, but would often be easier and less error prone with higher level tooling.
     23
     24Concurrent programming has many pitfalls that are unique and do not show up in sequential code:
     25\begin{enumerate}
     26\item Deadlock, where threads cyclically wait on resources, blocking them indefinitely.
     27\item Livelock, where threads constantly attempt a concurrent operation unsuccessfully, resulting in no progress being made.
     28\item Race conditions, where thread orderings can result in differing behaviours and correctness of a program execution.
     29\item Starvation, where threads may be deprived of access to some shared resource due to unfairness and never make progress.
     30\end{enumerate}
     31Even with the guiding hand of concurrent tools these pitfalls can still catch unwary programmers, but good language support can prevent, detect, and mitigate these problems.
     32
     33\section{A Brief Overview}
    1834
    1935The first chapter of this thesis aims to familiarize the reader with the language \CFA.
     
    3147The @waituntil@ statement presented provides greater flexibility and expressibility than similar features in other languages.
    3248All in all, the features presented aim to fill in gaps in the current \CFA concurrent language support, and enable users to write a wider range of complex concurrent programs with ease.
     49
     50\section{Contributions}
     51This work presents the following contributions:
     52\begin{enumerate}
     53\item The @mutex@ statement which:
     54\begin{itemize}[itemsep=0pt]
     55\item
     56provides deadlock-free multiple lock acquisition,
     57\item
     58clearly denotes lock acquisition and release,
     59\item
     60and has good performance irrespective of lock ordering.
     61\end{itemize}
     62\item Channels which:
     63\begin{itemize}[itemsep=0pt]
     64    \item
     65    achieves comparable performance to Go, the gold standard for concurrent channels,
     66    \item
     67    has deadlock detection,
     68    \item
     69    introduces easy-to-use exception-based @close@ semantics,
     70    \item
     71    and provides toggle-able statistics for performance tuning.
     72\end{itemize}
     73\item An in-memory actor system that:
     74\begin{itemize}[itemsep=0pt]
     75    \item
     76    achieves the lowest latency message send of all tested systems,
     77    \item
     78    is the first inverted actor system to introduce queue stealing,
     79    \item
     80    attains zero-victim-cost stealing through a carefully constructed stealing mechanism,
     81    \item
     82    gains performance through static-typed message sends, eliminating the need for dynamic dispatch,
     83    \item
     84    introduces the copy queue, an array based queue specialized for the actor use case to minimize calls to the memory allocator,
     85    \item
     86    has robust detection of six tricky, but common actor programming errors,
     87    \item
     88    achieves very good performance on a diverse benchmark suite compared to other actor systems,
     89    \item
     90    and provides toggle-able statistics for performance tuning.
     91\end{itemize}
     92
     93\item A @waituntil@ statement which:
     94\begin{itemize}[itemsep=0pt]
     95    \item
     96    is the only known polymorphic synchronous multiplexing language feature,
     97    \item
     98    provides greater expressibility of waiting conditions than other languages,
     99    \item
     100    and achieves comparable performance to similar features in two other languages,
     101\end{itemize}
     102\end{enumerate}
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.