Changeset 4075228 for doc/theses
- Timestamp:
- Sep 25, 2018, 1:39:34 PM (6 years ago)
- Branches:
- ADT, aaron-thesis, arm-eh, ast-experimental, cleanup-dtors, deferred_resn, enum, forall-pointer-decay, jacob/cs343-translation, jenkins-sandbox, master, new-ast, new-ast-unique-expr, no_list, persistent-indexer, pthread-emulation, qualifiedEnum
- Children:
- 48b7085e
- Parents:
- 91a950c
- Location:
- doc/theses/aaron_moss_PhD/phd
- Files:
-
- 4 added
- 3 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
doc/theses/aaron_moss_PhD/phd/.gitignore
r91a950c r4075228 1 1 templates/ 2 code/a.out 2 3 thesis.pdf 3 4 thesis.aux -
doc/theses/aaron_moss_PhD/phd/cfa-macros.tex
r91a950c r4075228 43 43 tabsize=5, % N space tabbing 44 44 xleftmargin=\parindentlnth, % indent code to paragraph indentation 45 %mathescape=true, % LaTeX math escape in CFA code $...$46 45 escapechar=\$, % LaTeX escape in CFA code 47 46 keepspaces=true, % -
doc/theses/aaron_moss_PhD/phd/generic-types.tex
r91a950c r4075228 2 2 \label{generic-chap} 3 3 4 Talk about generic types. Pull from Moss~\etal\cite{Moss18}. 4 A significant shortcoming in standard C is the lack of reusable type-safe abstractions for generic data structures and algorithms. 5 Broadly speaking, there are three approaches to implement abstract data structures in C. 6 One approach is to write bespoke data structures for each context in which they are needed. 7 While this approach is flexible and supports integration with the C type checker and tooling, it is also tedious and error prone, especially for more complex data structures. 8 A second approach is to use !void*!-based polymorphism, \eg{} the C standard library functions !bsearch! and !qsort!, which allow for the reuse of common functionality. 9 However, basing all polymorphism on !void*! eliminates the type checker's ability to ensure that argument types are properly matched, often requiring a number of extra function parameters, pointer indirection, and dynamic allocation that is otherwise not needed. 10 A third approach to generic code is to use preprocessor macros, which does allow the generated code to be both generic and type checked, but errors in such code may be difficult to locate and debug. 11 Furthermore, writing and using preprocessor macros is unnatural and inflexible. 12 Figure~\ref{bespoke-generic-fig} demonstrates the bespoke approach for a simple linked list and !head! operation, while Figure~\ref{void-generic-fig} and Figure~\ref{macro-generic-fig} show the same example using !void*!- and !#define!-based polymorphism, respectively. 13 14 \begin{figure} 15 \begin{cfa} 16 struct int_list { int value; struct int_list* next; }; 17 18 void int_list_insert( struct int_list** ls, int x ) { 19 struct int_list* node = malloc(sizeof(struct int_list)); 20 node->value = x; node->next = *ls; 21 *ls = node; 22 } 23 24 int int_list_head( const struct int_list* ls ) { return ls->value; } 25 26 $\C[\textwidth]{// all code must be duplicated for every generic instantiation}$ 27 28 struct string_list { const char* value; struct string_list* next; }; 29 30 void string_list_insert( struct string_list** ls, const char* x ) { 31 struct string_list* node = malloc(sizeof(struct string_list)); 32 node->value = x; node->next = *ls; 33 *ls = node; 34 } 35 36 const char* string_list_head( const struct string_list* ls ) 37 { return ls->value; } 38 39 $\C[\textwidth]{// use is efficient and idiomatic}$ 40 41 int main() { 42 struct int_list* il = NULL; 43 int_list_insert( &il, 42 ); 44 printf("%d\n", int_list_head(il)); 45 46 struct string_list* sl = NULL; 47 string_list_insert( &sl, "hello" ); 48 printf("%s\n", string_list_head(sl) ); 49 } 50 \end{cfa} 51 52 \caption{Bespoke code for linked list implementation.} \label{bespoke-generic-fig} 53 \end{figure} 54 55 \begin{figure} 56 \begin{cfa} 57 // single code implementation 58 59 struct list { void* value; struct list* next; }; 60 61 $\C[\textwidth]{// internal memory management requires helper functions}$ 62 63 void list_insert( struct list** ls, void* x, void* (*copy)(void*) ) { 64 struct list* node = malloc(sizeof(struct list)); 65 node->value = copy(x); node->next = *ls; 66 *ls = node; 67 } 68 69 void* list_head( const struct list* ls ) { return ls->value; } 70 71 $\C[\textwidth]{// helpers duplicated per type}$ 72 73 void* int_copy(void* x) { 74 int* n = malloc(sizeof(int)); 75 *n = *(int*)x; 76 return n; 77 } 78 79 void* string_copy(void* x) { return strdup((const char*)x); } 80 81 int main() { 82 struct list* il = NULL; 83 int i = 42; 84 list_insert( &il, &i, int_copy ); 85 printf("%d\n", *(int*)list_head(il)); $\C[2in]{// unsafe type cast}$ 86 87 struct list* sl = NULL; 88 list_insert( &sl, "hello", string_copy ); 89 printf("%s\n", (char*)list_head(sl) ); $\C[2in]{// unsafe type cast}$ 90 } 91 \end{cfa} 92 93 \caption{\lstinline{void*}-polymorphic code for linked list implementation.} \label{void-generic-fig} 94 \end{figure} 95 96 \begin{figure} 97 \begin{cfa} 98 $\C[\textwidth]{// code is nested in macros}$ 99 100 #define list(N) N ## _list 101 102 #define list_insert(N) N ## _list_insert 103 104 #define list_head(N) N ## _list_head 105 106 #define define_list(N, T) $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 107 struct list(N) { T value; struct list(N)* next; }; $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 108 $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 109 void list_insert(N)( struct list(N)** ls, T x ) { $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 110 struct list(N)* node = malloc(sizeof(struct list(N))); $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 111 node->value = x; node->next = *ls; $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 112 *ls = node; $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 113 } $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 114 $\C[0.25in]{ \textbackslash }$ 115 T list_head(N)( const struct list(N)* ls ) { return ls->value; } 116 117 define_list(int, int); $\C[3in]{// defines int\_list}$ 118 define_list(string, const char*); $\C[3in]{// defines string\_list}$ 119 120 $\C[\textwidth]{// use is efficient, but syntactically idiosyncratic}$ 121 122 int main() { 123 struct list(int)* il = NULL; $\C[3in]{// does not match compiler-visible name}$ 124 list_insert(int)( &il, 42 ); 125 printf("%d\n", list_head(int)(il)); 126 127 struct list(string)* sl = NULL; 128 list_insert(string)( &sl, "hello" ); 129 printf("%s\n", list_head(string)(sl) ); 130 } 131 \end{cfa} 132 133 \caption{Macros for linked list implementation.} \label{macro-generic-fig} 134 \end{figure} 135 136 137 % discuss at length design alternatives to support polymorphism with separate compilation, C backward compatibility, and support for overriding pre-defined functions 5 138 6 139 % TODO discuss layout function algorithm, application to separate compilation 7 % TODO put a static const field in for _n_fields for each generic, describe utility for separate compilation 8 9 % TODO mention impetus for zero_t design 10 11 % TODO mention use in tuple-type implementation 140 % TODO put a static const field in for _n_fields for each generic, describe utility for separate compilation (actually no, you need to be able to see the type for it to be sized) 12 141 13 142 % TODO pull benchmarks from Moss et al.
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.