source: doc/theses/jiada_liang_MMath/Cenum.tex @ 737bf73

Last change on this file since 737bf73 was c1c0efdb, checked in by Peter A. Buhr <pabuhr@…>, 3 months ago

last proofread of thesis

  • Property mode set to 100644
File size: 4.6 KB
RevLine 
[9d3a4cc]1\chapter{C Enumeration in \texorpdfstring{\CFA}{Cforall}}
[dd78dbc]2
[c4aca65]3\CFA supports legacy C enumeration using the same syntax for backward compatibility.
[a57ad8a]4A C-style enumeration in \CFA is called a \newterm{C Enum}.
5The semantics of the C Enum is mostly consistent with C with some restrictions.
[94643698]6The following sections detail all of my new contributions to enumerations in C.
[a57ad8a]7
[dd78dbc]8
[0c51c8b4]9\section{Visibility}
10\label{s:CVisibility}
[dd78dbc]11
12In C, unscoped enumerators present a \newterm{naming problem} when multiple enumeration types appear in the same scope with duplicate enumerator names.
[a57ad8a]13\begin{cfa}
14enum E1 { First, Second, Third, Fourth };
15enum E2 { @Fourth@, @Third@, @Second@, @First@ }; $\C{// same enumerator names}$
16\end{cfa}
[c1c0efdb]17There is no mechanism in C to resolve these naming conflicts other than renaming one of the duplicates, which may be impossible if the conflict comes from system include-files.
[dd78dbc]18
19The \CFA type-system allows extensive overloading, including enumerators.
[a57ad8a]20Hence, most ambiguities among C enumerators are implicitly resolved by the \CFA type system, possibly without any programmer knowledge of the conflict.
[c1c0efdb]21In addition, C Enum qualification is added, exactly like aggregate field-qualification, to disambiguate.
[a57ad8a]22\VRef[Figure]{f:EnumeratorVisibility} shows how resolution, qualification, and casting are used to disambiguate situations for enumerations @E1@ and @E2@.
[dd78dbc]23
24\begin{figure}
25\begin{cfa}
[c141c09]26E1 f() { return Third; }                                $\C{// overload functions with different return types}$
[dd78dbc]27E2 f() { return Fourth; }
28void g( E1 e );
29void h( E2 e );
30void foo() {                                                    $\C{// different resolutions and dealing with ambiguities}$
31        E1 e1 = First;   E2 e2 = First;         $\C{// initialization}$
32        e1 = Second;   e2 = Second;                     $\C{// assignment}$
33        e1 = f();   e2 = f();                           $\C{// function return}$
34        g( First );   h( First );                       $\C{// function argument}$
35        int i = @E1.@First + @E2.@First;        $\C{// disambiguate with qualification}$
36        int j = @(E1)@First + @(E2)@First;      $\C{// disambiguate with cast}$
37}
38\end{cfa}
39\caption{Enumerator Visibility and Disambiguating}
40\label{f:EnumeratorVisibility}
41\end{figure}
42
43
[0c51c8b4]44\section{Scoping}
[dd78dbc]45
[a57ad8a]46A C Enum can be scoped, using @'!'@, so the enumerator constants are not projected into the enclosing scope.
[dd78dbc]47\begin{cfa}
48enum Week @!@ { Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu = 10, Fri, Sat, Sun };
49enum RGB @!@ { Red, Green, Blue };
50\end{cfa}
51Now the enumerators \emph{must} be qualified with the associated enumeration type.
52\begin{cfa}
53Week week = @Week.@Mon;
54week = @Week.@Sat;
55RGB rgb = @RGB.@Red;
56rgb = @RGB.@Blue;
57\end{cfa}
[94643698]58% with feature unimplemented
[a57ad8a]59It is possible to toggle back to unscoped using the \CFA @with@ auto-qualification clause/statement (see also \CC \lstinline[language=c++]{using enum} in Section~\ref{s:C++RelatedWork}).
[dd78dbc]60\begin{cfa}
61with ( @Week@, @RGB@ ) {                                $\C{// type names}$
62         week = @Sun@;                                          $\C{// no qualification}$
63         rgb = @Green@;
64}
65\end{cfa}
[0c51c8b4]66As in Section~\ref{s:CVisibility}, opening multiple scoped enumerations in a @with@ can result in duplicate enumeration names, but \CFA implicit type resolution and explicit qualification/casting handle this localized scenario.
[dd78dbc]67
[a57ad8a]68
[dd78dbc]69\section{Type Safety}
[c1c0efdb]70\label{s:TypeSafety}
[dd78dbc]71
[c141c09]72As in Section~\ref{s:Usage}, C's implicit bidirectional conversion between enumeration and integral type raises a safety concern.
[a57ad8a]73In \CFA, the conversion is changed to unidirectional: an enumeration can be implicitly converted into an integral type, with an associated @safe@ conversion cost.
[c4aca65]74However, an integral type cannot be implicitly converted into a C enumeration because the conversion cost is set to @infinity@.
[dd78dbc]75\begin{cfa}
[a57ad8a]76enum Bird { Penguin, Robin, Eagle };
[dd78dbc]77enum Fish { Shark, Salmon, Whale };
78
[94643698]79int i = Robin;                                                  $\C{// allow, implicitly converts to 1}$
80enum Bird @bird = 1;@                                   $\C{// disallow }$
81enum Bird @bird = Shark;@                               $\C{// disallow }$
[a57ad8a]82\end{cfa}
83It is now up to the programmer to insert an explicit cast to force the assignment.
84\begin{cfa}
85enum Bird bird = @(Bird)@1;
[94643698]86enum Bird bird = @(Bird)@Shark
[a57ad8a]87\end{cfa}
88
89Note, \CC has the same safe restriction~\cite[C.1.5.7.2]{C++} and provides the same workaround cast.
90\begin{description}[parsep=0pt]
91\item[Change:] \CC objects of enumeration type can only be assigned values of the same enumeration type.
92In C, objects of enumeration type can be assigned values of any integral type.
93Example:
94\begin{cfa}
95enum color { red, blue, green };
96color c = 1;                            $\C{// valid C, invalid \CC}$
[c141c09]97\end{cfa}
[a57ad8a]98\item[Rationale:] The type-safe nature of \CC.
99\item[Effect on original feature:] Deletion of semantically well-defined feature.
100\item[Difficulty of converting:] Syntactic transformation. (The type error produced by the assignment can be
101automatically corrected by applying an explicit cast.)
102\item[How widely used:] Common.
103\end{description}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.