Changeset f277ab6c

Timestamp:

Dec 12, 2023, 2:35:39 PM (5 months ago)

Author:

Peter A. Buhr <pabuhr@…>

Branches:

master

Children:

c40157e

Parents:

7972603

Message:

comment back in lstinputlisting files after missing files pushed

File:

• doc/theses/mike_brooks_MMath/background.tex (modified) (6 diffs)

doc/theses/mike_brooks_MMath/background.tex

@@ -40 +40 @@
 
 TODO: typeset
-%\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=13, lastline=56]{bkgd-c-tyerr.c}
+\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=13, lastline=56]{bkgd-c-tyerr.c}
 
 
@@ -48 +48 @@
 
 TODO: typeset
-%\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=35, lastline=116]{bkgd-carray-arrty.c}
+\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=35, lastline=116]{bkgd-carray-arrty.c}
 
 My contribution is enabled by recognizing
@@ -176 +176 @@
 
 TODO: typeset
-%\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=4, lastline=26]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
+\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=4, lastline=26]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
 
 
@@ -229 +229 @@
 the parameter's type becomes a type that I summarize as being the array-decayed type.
 The respective handlings of the following two parameter spellings shows that the array-spelled one is really, like the other, a pointer.
-%\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=40, lastline=44]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
+\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=40, lastline=44]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
 As the @sizeof(x)@ meaning changed, compared with when run on a similarly-spelled local variariable declaration,
 GCC also gives this code the warning: ```sizeof' on array function parameter `x' will return size of `float *'.''
 
 The caller of such a function is left with the reality that a pointer parameter is a pointer, no matter how it's spelled:
-%\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=60, lastline=63]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
+\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=60, lastline=63]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
 This fragment gives no warnings.
 
@@ -240 +240 @@
 Note the opposite meaning of this spelling now, compared with its use in local variable declarations.
 This point of confusion is illustrated in:
-%\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=80, lastline=87]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
+\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=80, lastline=87]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
 The basic two meanings, with a syntactic difference helping to distinguish,
 are illustrated in the declarations of @ca@ vs.\ @cp@,
@@ -259 +259 @@
 Pointer decay does not affect pointer-to-array types, because these are already pointers, not arrays.
 As a result, a function with a pointer-to-array parameter sees the parameter exactly as the caller does:
-%\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=100, lastline=110]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}
+\lstinputlisting[language=C, firstline=100, lastline=110]{bkgd-carray-decay.c}