Changeset d435c04

Timestamp:

Jan 12, 2021, 6:06:04 PM (4 years ago)

Author:

Andrew Beach <ajbeach@…>

Branches:

ADT, arm-eh, ast-experimental, enum, forall-pointer-decay, jacob/cs343-translation, master, new-ast-unique-expr, pthread-emulation, qualifiedEnum

Children:

26ca815

Parents:

20207c0

Message:

Andrew MMath: Removed some extra \ characters.

File:

• doc/theses/andrew_beach_MMath/existing.tex (modified) (3 diffs)

doc/theses/andrew_beach_MMath/existing.tex

@@ -83 +83 @@
 the the call site.
 
-As an example, even if no function named \codeCFA{do\_once} is not defined
-near the definition of \codeCFA{do\_twice} the following code will work.
+As an example, even if no function named \codeCFA{do_once} is not defined
+near the definition of \codeCFA{do_twice} the following code will work.
 \begin{lstlisting}
 int quadruple(int x) {
@@ -95 +95 @@
 \end{lstlisting}
 This is not the recommended way to implement a quadruple function but it
-does work. The complier will deduce that \codeCFA{do\_twice}'s T is an
+does work. The complier will deduce that \codeCFA{do_twice}'s T is an
 integer from the argument. It will then look for a definition matching the
-assertion which is the \codeCFA{do\_once} defined within the function. That
-function will be passed in as a function pointer to \codeCFA{do\_twice} and
+assertion which is the \codeCFA{do_once} defined within the function. That
+function will be passed in as a function pointer to \codeCFA{do_twice} and
 called within it.
 
@@ -156 +156 @@
 In \CFA coroutines are created using the \codeCFA{coroutine} keyword which
 works just like \codeCFA{struct} except that the created structure will be
-modified by the compiler to satify the \codeCFA{is\_coroutine} trait.
+modified by the compiler to satify the \codeCFA{is_coroutine} trait.
 
 These structures act as the interface between callers and the coroutine,