Changeset ad89296 for libcfa/src

Timestamp:

Apr 30, 2021, 1:09:38 PM (4 years ago)

Author:

Thierry Delisle <tdelisle@…>

Branches:

ADT, arm-eh, ast-experimental, enum, forall-pointer-decay, jacob/cs343-translation, master, new-ast-unique-expr, pthread-emulation, qualifiedEnum

Children:

bac0ba8

Parents:

34b2796 (diff), b9dae14c (diff)
Note: this is a merge changeset, the changes displayed below correspond to the merge itself.
Use the (diff) links above to see all the changes relative to each parent.

Message:

Merge branch 'master' of plg.uwaterloo.ca:software/cfa/cfa-cc

File:

• libcfa/src/containers/array.hfa (modified) (5 diffs)

libcfa/src/containers/array.hfa

@@ -5 +5 @@
 
 // the inverse of Z(-)
-#define z(Zn) sizeof(Zn)
-
-// if you're expecting a Z(n), say so, by asking for a ztype, instead of dtype or otype
-#define ztype(Zn) Zn & | sized(Zn)
+#define z(N) sizeof(N)
 
 forall( T & ) struct tag {};
@@ -19 +16 @@
 //
 
-forall( ztype(Zn), ztype(S), Timmed &, Tbase & ) {
+forall( [N], [S], Timmed &, Tbase & ) {
     struct arpk {
-        S strides[z(Zn)];
+        S strides[z(N)];
     };
 
-    Timmed & ?[?]( arpk(Zn, S, Timmed, Tbase) & a, ptrdiff_t i ) {
+    Timmed & ?[?]( arpk(N, S, Timmed, Tbase) & a, ptrdiff_t i ) {
         return (Timmed &) a.strides[i];
     }
 
-    size_t ?`len( arpk(Zn, S, Timmed, Tbase) & a ) {
-        return z(Zn);
+    Timmed & ?[?]( arpk(N, S, Timmed, Tbase) & a, int i ) {
+        return (Timmed &) a.strides[i];
+    }
+
+    Timmed & ?[?]( arpk(N, S, Timmed, Tbase) & a, size_t i ) {
+        return (Timmed &) a.strides[i];
+    }
+
+    size_t ?`len( arpk(N, S, Timmed, Tbase) & a ) {
+        return z(N);
     }
 
     // workaround #226 (and array relevance thereof demonstrated in mike102/otype-slow-ndims.cfa)
-    void ?{}( arpk(Zn, S, Timmed, Tbase) & this ) {
-        void ?{}( S (&inner)[z(Zn)] ) {}
+    void ?{}( arpk(N, S, Timmed, Tbase) & this ) {
+        void ?{}( S (&inner)[z(N)] ) {}
         ?{}(this.strides);
     }
-    void ^?{}( arpk(Zn, S, Timmed, Tbase) & this ) {
-        void ^?{}( S (&inner)[z(Zn)] ) {}
+    void ^?{}( arpk(N, S, Timmed, Tbase) & this ) {
+        void ^?{}( S (&inner)[z(N)] ) {}
         ^?{}(this.strides);
     }
@@ -50 +55 @@
 Te mkar_( tag(Te) ) {}
 
-forall( ztype(Zn), ZTags ... , Trslt &, Tatom & | { Trslt mkar_( tag(Tatom), ZTags ); } )
-arpk(Zn, Trslt, Trslt, Tatom) mkar_( tag(Tatom), tag(Zn), ZTags ) {}
+forall( [N], ZTags ... , Trslt &, Tatom & | { Trslt mkar_( tag(Tatom), ZTags ); } )
+arpk(N, Trslt, Trslt, Tatom) mkar_( tag(Tatom), tag(N), ZTags ) {}
 
 // based on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1872220/is-it-possible-to-iterate-over-arguments-in-variadic-macros
@@ -80 +85 @@
 // Core -[[-,-,-]] operator
 
+#ifdef TRY_BROKEN_DESIRED_MD_SUBSCRIPT
+
 // Desired form.  One definition with recursion on IxBC (worked until Jan 2021, see trac #__TODO__)
-// forall( TA &, TB &, TC &, IxAB, IxBC ... | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB ); TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); } )
-// TC & ?[?]( TA & this, IxAB ab, IxBC bc ) {
-//     return this[ab][bc];
-// }
 
-// Workaround form.  Listing all possibilities up to 4 dims.
-forall( TA &, TB &, IxAB | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB ); }
-            , TC &, IxBC | { TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); } )
+forall( TA &, TB &, TC &, IxAB, IxBC ... | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB ); TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); } )
 TC & ?[?]( TA & this, IxAB ab, IxBC bc ) {
     return this[ab][bc];
 }
-forall( TA &, TB &, IxAB | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB ); }
-            , TC &, IxBC | { TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); }
-            , TD &, IxCD | { TD & ?[?]( TC &, IxCD ); } )
-TD & ?[?]( TA & this, IxAB ab, IxBC bc, IxCD cd ) {
-    return this[ab][bc][cd];
-}
-forall( TA &, TB &, IxAB | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB ); }
-            , TC &, IxBC | { TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); }
-            , TD &, IxCD | { TD & ?[?]( TC &, IxCD ); }
-            , TE &, IxDE | { TE & ?[?]( TD &, IxDE ); } )
-TE & ?[?]( TA & this, IxAB ab, IxBC bc, IxCD cd, IxDE de ) {
-    return this[ab][bc][cd][de];
+
+#else 
+
+// Workaround form.  Listing all possibilities up to 4 dims.
+
+forall( TA &, TB &, TC &, IxAB_0, IxBC | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB_0 ); TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); } )
+TC & ?[?]( TA & this, IxAB_0 ab, IxBC bc ) {
+    return this[ab][bc];
 }
 
-// Adapters for "indexed by ptrdiff_t" implies "indexed by [this other integral type]"
-// Work around restriction that assertions underlying -[[-,-,-]] must match excatly
-forall( C &, E & | { E & ?[?]( C &, ptrdiff_t ); } ) {
+forall( TA &, TB &, TC &, IxAB_0, IxAB_1, IxBC | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB_0, IxAB_1 ); TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); } )
+TC & ?[?]( TA & this, IxAB_0 ab0, IxAB_1 ab1, IxBC bc ) {
+    return this[[ab0,ab1]][bc];
+}
 
-    // Targeted to support:  for( i; z(N) ) ... a[[ ..., i, ... ]]
-    E & ?[?]( C & this, size_t i ) {
-        return this[ (ptrdiff_t) i ];
-    }
+forall( TA &, TB &, TC &, IxAB_0, IxAB_1, IxAB_2, IxBC | { TB & ?[?]( TA &, IxAB_0, IxAB_1, IxAB_2 ); TC & ?[?]( TB &, IxBC ); } )
+TC & ?[?]( TA & this, IxAB_0 ab0, IxAB_1 ab1, IxAB_2 ab2, IxBC bc ) {
+    return this[[ab0,ab1,ab2]][bc];
+}
 
-    // Targeted to support:  for( i; 5 ) ... a[[ ..., i, ... ]]
-    E & ?[?]( C & this, int i ) {
-        return this[ (ptrdiff_t) i ];
-    }
-}
+#endif
 
 //
@@ -126 +120 @@
 
 // Base
-forall( ztype(Zq), ztype(Sq), Tbase & )
-tag(arpk(Zq, Sq, Tbase, Tbase)) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(Zq), tag(Sq), tag(Tbase) ) {}
+forall( [Nq], [Sq], Tbase & )
+tag(arpk(Nq, Sq, Tbase, Tbase)) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(Nq), tag(Sq), tag(Tbase) ) {}
 
 // Rec
-forall( ztype(Zq), ztype(Sq), ztype(Z), ztype(S), recq &, recr &, Tbase & | { tag(recr) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(Zq), tag(Sq), tag(recq) ); } )
-tag(arpk(Z, S, recr, Tbase)) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(Zq), tag(Sq), tag(arpk(Z, S, recq, Tbase)) ) {}
+forall( [Nq], [Sq], [N], [S], recq &, recr &, Tbase & | { tag(recr) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(Nq), tag(Sq), tag(recq) ); } )
+tag(arpk(N, S, recr, Tbase)) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(Nq), tag(Sq), tag(arpk(N, S, recq, Tbase)) ) {}
 
 // Wrapper
 struct all_t {} all;
-forall( ztype(Z), ztype(S), Te &, result &, Tbase & | { tag(result) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(Z), tag(S), tag(Te) ); } )
-result & ?[?]( arpk(Z, S, Te, Tbase) & this, all_t ) {
+forall( [N], [S], Te &, result &, Tbase & | { tag(result) enq_( tag(Tbase), tag(N), tag(S), tag(Te) ); } )
+result & ?[?]( arpk(N, S, Te, Tbase) & this, all_t ) {
     return (result&) this;
 }