Changeset 822332e for src/Validate

Timestamp:

May 30, 2024, 2:36:08 PM (4 months ago)

Author:

Andrew Beach <ajbeach@…>

Branches:

master

Children:

0f5e8cd

Parents:

91b9e10

Message:

It seems clang uses different scoping rules for the trailing return of a scoped runction declaration. This form seems compatable with clang and gcc. Since I switched over to clang for testing I also cleaned up all errors that clang or gcc mentioned.

File:

• src/Validate/ImplementEnumFunc.cpp (modified) (4 diffs)

src/Validate/ImplementEnumFunc.cpp

@@ -9 +9 @@
 class EnumAttrFuncGenerator {
         const ast::EnumDecl* decl;
-        const ast::EnumInstType* instType;
         unsigned int functionNesting;
         ast::Linkage::Spec proto_linkage;
@@ -21 +20 @@
         EnumAttrFuncGenerator(
                         const ast::EnumDecl* decl,
-                        const ast::EnumInstType* instType,
+                        const ast::EnumInstType*,
                         unsigned int functionNesting )
                 : decl(decl),
-                  instType{instType},
                   functionNesting{functionNesting},
                   proto_linkage{ast::Linkage::Cforall} {}
@@ -50 +48 @@
         ast::FunctionDecl* genFromInstanceProto() const;
         ast::FunctionDecl* genInstToInstFuncProto(const char* func) const;
-        void genFromIntBody(ast::FunctionDecl *) const; 
+        void genFromIntBody(ast::FunctionDecl *) const;
         void genFromInstanceBody(ast::FunctionDecl *) const;
         void genSuccPredBody(ast::FunctionDecl *, const char *) const;
@@ -388 +386 @@
         if (decl->base) genTypedEnumFunction(ast::EnumAttribute::Value);
         genTypedEnumFunction(ast::EnumAttribute::Label);
-        genTypedEnumFunction(ast::EnumAttribute::Posn); 
+        genTypedEnumFunction(ast::EnumAttribute::Posn);
 }