Changeset 5d8cc96 for doc/theses/colby_parsons_MMAth

Timestamp:

Aug 1, 2023, 9:58:44 PM (17 months ago)

Author:

Peter A. Buhr <pabuhr@…>

Branches:

master

Children:

56eb7f8

Parents:

b3ac8ce3

Message:

move figure

File:

• doc/theses/colby_parsons_MMAth/text/actors.tex (modified) (2 diffs)

doc/theses/colby_parsons_MMAth/text/actors.tex

@@ -1365 +1365 @@
 \end{figure}
 
+\begin{figure}
+        \centering
+        \subfloat[AMD \CFA Matrix Benchmark]{
+                \resizebox{0.5\textwidth}{!}{\input{figures/nasusCFAMatrix.pgf}}
+                \label{f:cfaMatrixAMD}
+        }
+        \subfloat[Intel \CFA Matrix Benchmark]{
+                \resizebox{0.5\textwidth}{!}{\input{figures/pykeCFAMatrix.pgf}}
+                \label{f:cfaMatrixIntel}
+        }
+        \caption{The matrix benchmark comparing \CFA stealing heuristics (lower is better).}
+\end{figure}
+
 Figures~\ref{f:cfaRepeatAMD} and~\ref{f:cfaRepeatIntel} show the effects of the stealing heuristics for the repeat benchmark.
 This benchmark is a pathological case for work stealing actor systems, as the majority of work is being performed by the single actor conducting the scatter/gather.
@@ -1389 +1402 @@
 Hence, it is difficult to attribute the AMD gain to the aggressive work stealing in CAF.
 
-\begin{figure}
-        \centering
-        \subfloat[AMD \CFA Matrix Benchmark]{
-                \resizebox{0.5\textwidth}{!}{\input{figures/nasusCFAMatrix.pgf}}
-                \label{f:cfaMatrixAMD}
-        }
-        \subfloat[Intel \CFA Matrix Benchmark]{
-                \resizebox{0.5\textwidth}{!}{\input{figures/pykeCFAMatrix.pgf}}
-                \label{f:cfaMatrixIntel}
-        }
-        \caption{The matrix benchmark comparing \CFA stealing heuristics (lower is better).}
-\end{figure}
-
 % Local Variables: %
 % tab-width: 4 %