Changeset 39ffa5e for doc/theses

Timestamp:

Aug 11, 2025, 9:30:49 PM (6 weeks ago)

Author:

Peter A. Buhr <pabuhr@…>

Branches:

master

Children:

81e1984b

Parents:

e50b65c

Message:

fix macro name for printing uC++

File:

• doc/theses/mike_brooks_MMath/list.tex (modified) (2 diffs)

doc/theses/mike_brooks_MMath/list.tex

@@ -696 +696 @@
 \item[lq-list]  The @list@ type of LQ from glibc of gcc.
 \item[lq-tailq] The @tailq@ type of the same.
-\item[upp-upp]  \uC provided @uSequence@
+\item[upp-upp]  \uCpp provided @uSequence@
 \item[cfa-cfa]  \CFA's @dlist@
 \end{description}
@@ -854 +854 @@
 For this experiment, the results flipped in my favour when running on the server.
 New CPU architectures are now amazingly good at branch prediction and micro-parallelism in the pipelines.
-Specifically, on the PC, my \CFA and companion \uC lists are slower than lq-tail and lq-list by 10\% to 20\%.
-On the server, \CFA and \uC lists are can be fast by up to 100\%.
+Specifically, on the PC, my \CFA and companion \uCpp lists are slower than lq-tail and lq-list by 10\% to 20\%.
+On the server, \CFA and \uCpp lists are can be fast by up to 100\%.
 Overall, LQ-tailq does the best at short lengths but loses out above a dozen elements.