Changeset 037dc57

Timestamp:

Apr 26, 2026, 7:54:24 PM (2 days ago)

Author:

Michael Brooks <mlbrooks@…>

Branches:

master

Children:

1037b4c

Parents:

74accc6

Message:

further background proofreading from "forgot to press save" before last commit

File:

• doc/theses/mike_brooks_MMath/background.tex (modified) (1 diff)

doc/theses/mike_brooks_MMath/background.tex

@@ -1185 +1185 @@
 This macro-induced phenomenon led to an invalid pointer dereference (safety violation), at a run-time well after the removal at issue (costly to resolve).
 
-Instead, language function calls (even with inlining) handle argument mistakes locally at the call, giving a very specific error message.  In the world of \CC templates, concepts were introduced to deal with this problem.  Furthermovre, language function calls use (only) C-language semantics for argument evaluation, instead of applealing to reasoning about how the semantics might play out in an invisible substitution result.
-
-So, avoiding a macro-centric implementation helps uers avoid and diagnose critical mistakes.
+Instead, language function calls (even with inlining) handle argument mistakes locally at the call, giving a very specific error message.  In the world of \CC templates, concepts were introduced to deal with this problem.  Furthermore, language function calls use (only) C-language semantics for argument evaluation, instead of appealing to reasoning about how the semantics might play out in an invisible substitution result.
+
+So, avoiding a macro-centric implementation helps users avoid and diagnose critical mistakes.
 
 % example of poor error message due to LQ's preprocessed integration