1 | Enumeration Type Proposals |
---|
2 | ========================== |
---|
3 | With Jiada's recent work on enumerations (see doc/theses/jiada_liang_MMath/), |
---|
4 | this is a collection point for some remaining issues with and ideas to |
---|
5 | further improve enumerations. |
---|
6 | |
---|
7 | Fixed Encoding |
---|
8 | -------------- |
---|
9 | Because Cforall enumerations are encoded using their position, it can be |
---|
10 | difficult to give them a stable encoding. The |
---|
11 | |
---|
12 | The example (provided by Gregor Richards), is a system header that defines |
---|
13 | any type that has to be stable across versions. Let's say error codes. |
---|
14 | |
---|
15 | ```cfa |
---|
16 | enum() BigLibError! { |
---|
17 | BadArgument, |
---|
18 | ... |
---|
19 | MissingConfig, |
---|
20 | LastStartupError = MissingConfig, |
---|
21 | NoMemory, |
---|
22 | Timeout, |
---|
23 | ... |
---|
24 | }; |
---|
25 | ``` |
---|
26 | |
---|
27 | The actual errors are not important, but note that "LastStartupError" has |
---|
28 | to be in a particular location relative to some others. If a new version of |
---|
29 | the header wants to add a new startup error, it should go before the |
---|
30 | LastStartupError, but that will change the position, and hence the encoding, |
---|
31 | of all the remaining |
---|
32 | |
---|
33 | The most obvious example in an existing lanuage I could find is that Rust |
---|
34 | usually treats its enum types as opaques algebraic data types, but in certain |
---|
35 | cases allows you to fix the encoding of enumerations. |
---|
36 | (Although the motivation seems to be optimization of enumerations that |
---|
37 | have a lot of common options.) |
---|
38 | |
---|
39 | Enumerated Arrays |
---|
40 | ----------------- |
---|
41 | Arrays that use an enumeration as their index. The entire enumeration type |
---|
42 | (instead of a subset of int) is used in the index operation. |
---|
43 | |
---|
44 | Although described differently, this is actually a generalization of typed |
---|
45 | enumerations, as it can be used to safely represent a constant of any type |
---|
46 | for each possible enumeration value. |
---|
47 | |
---|
48 | ```cfa |
---|
49 | extern string colourNames[Colour]; |
---|
50 | ``` |
---|
51 | |
---|
52 | This example is a forward declaration that declares the symbol but does not |
---|
53 | give the values or allocate any storage. This is used in header files. |
---|
54 | The type of colourNames would be a new type `string[Colour]`. |
---|
55 | |
---|
56 | In implementation tiles it is safe to give the array's values; |
---|
57 | whether it the array has been previously forward declared or not. |
---|
58 | ```cfa |
---|
59 | string colourNames[Colour] = { |
---|
60 | "red", |
---|
61 | "violet", |
---|
62 | "blue", |
---|
63 | // Or without worrying about ordering: |
---|
64 | [Green] = "green", |
---|
65 | [Orange] = "orange", |
---|
66 | [Yellow] = "yellow", |
---|
67 | }; |
---|
68 | ``` |
---|
69 | |
---|
70 | The forward declaration and full definition variants allow the user to manage |
---|
71 | memory themselves, following the same rules as `extern` variables. |
---|
72 | The user can use `const` to fix the values in the array. |
---|
73 | These arrays can also be nested `BlendInfo blend[Colour][Colour]` or used |
---|
74 | locally. |
---|
75 | |
---|
76 | Except for the index type (and that the size of the array is fixed per |
---|
77 | index type, as it always covers the whole enumeration) it should be the same |
---|
78 | as a traditional array. |
---|
79 | |
---|
80 | Or one of the new safer Cforall arrays, as the features could be combined. |
---|
81 | |
---|
82 | (Previously, a compined declaration to declare both an enumeration and |
---|
83 | an enumerated array was proposed. That only covers the simple case that |
---|
84 | typed enumerations already cover.) |
---|
85 | |
---|
86 | Enumeration Ranges |
---|
87 | ------------------ |
---|
88 | We have the simplest iterate over a range of enumerations (can only be used |
---|
89 | directly in a for loop, always covers the entire type) but it could be |
---|
90 | generalized to work with the other features of ranges, such as going over |
---|
91 | just part of the enumeration (see Ranges in doc/proposals/iterators.md). |
---|
92 | |
---|
93 | Flag Set Enumerations |
---|
94 | --------------------- |
---|
95 | Another common use of enumerations is as a named bitset. |
---|
96 | |
---|
97 | This doesn't actually follow from the logical definition of enumerations, but |
---|
98 | is something that various implementation of "enum" have commonly been used to |
---|
99 | recreate. This would formalize that, providing an easy way to create typesafe |
---|
100 | implementations of this pattern. |
---|
101 | |
---|
102 | ```cfa |
---|
103 | enum Directions flag { |
---|
104 | Up, |
---|
105 | Down, |
---|
106 | Left, |
---|
107 | Right, |
---|
108 | Upwards = Up, |
---|
109 | Vertical = Up | Down, |
---|
110 | }; |
---|
111 | ``` |
---|
112 | |
---|
113 | Uses the existing enumeration syntax, except that all initializers must be |
---|
114 | bitwise expressions, using only the operators |, & and ~ and, as leaf values, |
---|
115 | other labels from the enumeration (no cycles) and 0. |
---|
116 | |
---|
117 | Each uninitialized label creates a new flag. Every instance of the |
---|
118 | enumeration will have each flag be set or unset. The labels act as instances |
---|
119 | of the enumeration with only that flag set. |
---|
120 | |
---|
121 | A type created this way automatically supports: default construction, |
---|
122 | from zero_t construction, copy construction, copy assignment, destruction, |
---|
123 | equality, inequality and bitwise and (&), or (|) and not (~). |
---|
124 | Default construction and from zero_t construction create an instance with no |
---|
125 | flags set. Two instances are the same if the same flags are set. |
---|
126 | Bitwise operations act on the individual flags in the set. |
---|
127 | |
---|
128 | In addition the type can be converted to a Boolean. |
---|
129 | An flag set is truthy if any flags are set and falsy if no flags are set. |
---|
130 | This is not a primitive operation, but comes from combining the zero_t |
---|
131 | constructor and inequality. |
---|
132 | |
---|
133 | Note: Scoping rules are also waiting on the namespacing and module system. |
---|