ADTaaron-thesisarm-ehast-experimentalcleanup-dtorsdeferred_resndemanglerenumforall-pointer-decayjacob/cs343-translationjenkins-sandboxnew-astnew-ast-unique-exprnew-envno_listpersistent-indexerpthread-emulationqualifiedEnumresolv-newwith_gc
|
Last change
on this file since acd738aa was
27dde72,
checked in by Thierry Delisle <tdelisle@…>, 7 years ago
|
|
Major update to the concurrency proposal to be based on multiple files
|
-
Property mode set to
100644
|
|
File size:
1.2 KB
|
| Rev | Line | |
|---|
| [27dde72] | 1 | % ====================================================================== |
|---|
| [db0fa7c] | 2 | \chapter{Introduction} |
|---|
| [27dde72] | 3 | % ====================================================================== |
|---|
| 4 | |
|---|
| 5 | This proposal provides a minimal concurrency API that is simple, efficient and can be reused to build higher-level features. The simplest possible concurrency core is a thread and a lock but this low-level approach is hard to master. An easier approach for users is to support higher-level constructs as the basis of the concurrency in \CFA. Indeed, for highly productive parallel programming, high-level approaches are much more popular~\cite{HPP:Study}. Examples are task based, message passing and implicit threading. |
|---|
| [db0fa7c] | 6 | |
|---|
| [27dde72] | 7 | There are actually two problems that need to be solved in the design of concurrency for a programming language: which concurrency tools are available to the users and which parallelism tools are available. While these two concepts are often seen together, they are in fact distinct concepts that require different sorts of tools~\cite{Buhr05a}. Concurrency tools need to handle mutual exclusion and synchronization, while parallelism tools are about performance, cost and resource utilization. |
|---|
Note: See
TracBrowser
for help on using the repository browser.
