source: doc/proposals/concurrency/text/cforall.tex @ dcfc4b3

Last change on this file since dcfc4b3 was dcfc4b3, checked in by Thierry Delisle <tdelisle@…>, 5 years ago

Added internals section and updated v0.10 up to chapter 4

  • Property mode set to 100644
File size: 6.2 KB
1% ======================================================================
2% ======================================================================
3\chapter{Cforall crash course}
4% ======================================================================
5% ======================================================================
7This thesis presents the design for a set of concurrency features in \CFA. Since it is a new dialect of C, the following is a quick introduction to the language, specifically tailored to the features needed to support concurrency.
9\CFA is a extension of ISO-C and therefore supports all of the same paradigms as C. It is a non-object oriented system language, meaning most of the major abstractions have either no runtime overhead or can be opt-out easily. Like C, the basics of \CFA revolve around structures and routines, which are thin abstractions over machine code. The vast majority of the code produced by the \CFA translator respects memory-layouts and calling-conventions laid out by C. Interestingly, while \CFA is not an object-oriented language, lacking the concept of a received (e.g.: this), it does have some notion of objects\footnote{C defines the term objects as : [Where to I get the C11 reference manual?]}, most importantly construction and destruction of objects. Most of the following pieces of code can be found on the \CFA website \cite{www-cfa}
13Like \CC, \CFA introduces references as an alternative to pointers. In regards to concurrency, the semantics difference between pointers and references are not particularly relevant but since this document uses mostly references here is a quick overview of the semantics :
15int x, *p1 = &x, **p2 = &p1, ***p3 = &p2,
16&r1 = x,    &&r2 = r1,   &&&r3 = r2;
17***p3 = 3;                                                      //change x
18r3    = 3;                                                      //change x, ***r3
19**p3  = ...;                                            //change p1
20*p3   = ...;                                            //change p2
21int y, z, & ar[3] = {x, y, z};          //initialize array of references
22typeof( ar[1]) p;                                       //is int, i.e., the type of referenced object
23typeof(&ar[1]) q;                                       //is int &, i.e., the type of reference
24sizeof( ar[1]) == sizeof(int);          //is true, i.e., the size of referenced object
25sizeof(&ar[1]) == sizeof(int *);        //is true, i.e., the size of a reference
27The important thing to take away from this code snippet is that references offer a handle to an object much like pointers but which is automatically derefferenced when convinient.
31Another important feature of \CFA is function overloading as in Java and \CC, where routine with the same name are selected based on the numbers and type of the arguments. As well, \CFA uses the return type as part of the selection criteria, as in Ada\cite{Ada}. For routines with multiple parameters and returns, the selection is complex.
33//selection based on type and number of parameters
34void f(void);                   //(1)
35void f(char);                   //(2)
36void f(int, double);    //(3)
37f();                                    //select (1)
38f('a');                                 //select (2)
39f(3, 5.2);                              //select (3)
41//selection based on  type and number of returns
42char   f(int);                  //(1)
43double f(int);                  //(2)
44char   c = f(3);                //select (1)
45double d = f(4);                //select (2)
47This feature is particularly important for concurrency since the runtime system relies on creating different types to represent concurrency objects. Therefore, overloading is necessary to prevent the need for long prefixes and other naming conventions that prevent name clashes. As seen in chapter \ref{basics}, routines main is an example that benefits from overloading.
50Overloading also extends to operators. The syntax for denoting operator-overloading is to name a routine with the symbol of the operator and question marks where the arguments of the operation would be, like so :
52int ++? (int op);                       //unary prefix increment
53int ?++ (int op);                       //unary postfix increment
54int ?+? (int op1, int op2);             //binary plus
55int ?<=?(int op1, int op2);             //binary less than
56int ?=? (int & op1, int op2);           //binary assignment
57int ?+=?(int & op1, int op2);           //binary plus-assignment
59struct S {int i, j;};
60S ?+?(S op1, S op2) {                           //add two structures
61        return (S){op1.i + op2.i, op1.j + op2.j};
63S s1 = {1, 2}, s2 = {2, 3}, s3;
64s3 = s1 + s2;                                           //compute sum: s3 == {2, 5}
66While concurrency does not use operator overloading directly, this feature is more important as an introduction for the syntax of constructors.
69Object life-time is often a challenge in concurrency. \CFA uses the approach of giving concurrent meaning to object life-time as a mean of synchronization and/or mutual exclusion. Since \CFA relies heavily on the life time of objects, constructors and destructors are a core feature required for concurrency and parallelism. \CFA uses the following syntax for constructors and destructors :
71struct S {
72        size_t size;
73        int * ia;
75void ?{}(S & s, int asize) {    //constructor operator
76        s.size = asize;                         //initialize fields
77        s.ia = calloc(size, sizeof(S));
79void ^?{}(S & s) {                              //destructor operator
80        free(ia);                                       //de-initialization fields
82int main() {
83        S x = {10}, y = {100};          //implict calls: ?{}(x, 10), ?{}(y, 100)
84        ...                                                     //use x and y
85        ^x{}^y{};                            //explicit calls to de-initialize
86        x{20};  y{200};                         //explicit calls to reinitialize
87        ...                                                     //reuse x and y
88}                                                               //implict calls: ^?{}(y), ^?{}(x)
90The language guarantees that every object and all their fields are constructed. Like \CC, construction of an object is automatically done on allocation and destruction of the object is done on deallocation. Allocation and deallocation can occur on the stack or on the heap.
93        struct S s = {10};      //allocation, call constructor
94        ...
95}                                               //deallocation, call destructor
96struct S * s = new();   //allocation, call constructor
98delete(s);                              //deallocation, call destructor
100Note that like \CC, \CFA introduces \code{new} and \code{delete}, which behave like \code{malloc} and \code{free} in addition to constructing and destructing objects, after calling \code{malloc} and before calling \code{free} respectively.
102For more information on \CFA see \cite{cforall-ug,rob-thesis,www-cfa}.
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.