Index: doc/theses/colby_parsons_MMAth/text/waituntil.tex
===================================================================
--- doc/theses/colby_parsons_MMAth/text/waituntil.tex	(revision ea1bb945c6ba2262676128040e949a23557ed13d)
+++ doc/theses/colby_parsons_MMAth/text/waituntil.tex	(revision bbecdd4e92ef5af54bd26d222e3783bf68890eaf)
@@ -501,6 +501,6 @@
 Another difference between Go and \CFA is the order of clause selection when multiple clauses are available.
 Go "randomly" selects a clause, but \CFA chooses the clause in the order they are listed~\cite{go:select}.
-This \CFA design decision allows users to set implicit priorities, which can result in more predictable behaviour, and even better performance in certain cases, such as the case shown in  Table~\ref{}.
-If \CFA didn't have priorities, the performance difference in Table~\ref{} would be less significant since @P1@ and @C1@ would try to compete to operate on @B@ more often with random selection.
+This \CFA design decision allows users to set implicit priorities, which can result in more predictable behaviour, and even better performance in certain cases, such as the case shown in  Table~\ref{t:pathGo}.
+If \CFA didn't have priorities, the performance difference in Table~\ref{t:pathGo} would be less significant since @P1@ and @C1@ would try to compete to operate on @B@ more often with random selection.
 
 \subsection{Future Benchmark}