Index: doc/generic_types/generic_types.tex
===================================================================
--- doc/generic_types/generic_types.tex	(revision 1dc6df001ee514a009bfc103942e0b4dbe92ea61)
+++ doc/generic_types/generic_types.tex	(revision 0aad606e578f8a98275d294bfe7e9d68c8077660)
@@ -991,4 +991,9 @@
 \end{figure}
 
+Figure~\ref{fig:eval} and Table~\ref{tab:eval} show the results of running the benchmark in Figure~\ref{fig:BenchmarkTest} and its C, \CC, and \CCV equivalents. 
+The graph plots the median of 5 consecutive runs of each program, with an initial warm-up run omitted.
+All code is compiled at \texttt{-O2} by GCC or G++ 6.2.0, with all \CC code compiled as \CCfourteen.
+The benchmarks are run on an Ubuntu 16.04 workstation with 16 GB of RAM and a 6-core AMD FX-6300 CPU with 3.5 GHz maximum clock frequency.
+
 \begin{figure}
 \centering
@@ -1010,9 +1015,4 @@
 \end{tabular}
 \end{table}
-
-Figure~\ref{fig:eval} and Table~\ref{tab:eval} show the results of running the benchmark in Figure~\ref{fig:BenchmarkTest} and its C, \CC, and \CCV equivalents. 
-The graph plots the median of 5 consecutive runs of each program, with an initial warm-up run omitted.
-All code is compiled at \texttt{-O2} by GCC or G++ 6.2.0, with all \CC code compiled as \CCfourteen.
-The benchmarks are run on an Ubuntu 16.04 workstation with 16 GB of RAM and a 6-core AMD FX-6300 CPU with 3.5 GHz maximum clock frequency.
 
 The C and \CCV variants are generally the slowest with the largest memory footprint, because to their less-efficient memory layout and the pointer-indirection necessary to implement generic types;