\chapter{Implementation}
\label{c:implement}

% Local Helpers:
\newcommand\transformline[1][becomes...]{
  \hrulefill#1\hrulefill
  \medskip
}

The implementation work for this thesis covers the two components: virtual
system and exceptions. Each component is discussed in detail.

\section{Virtual System}
\label{s:VirtualSystem}
% Virtual table rules. Virtual tables, the pointer to them and the cast.
While the \CFA virtual system currently has only one public feature, virtual
cast (see the virtual cast feature \vpageref{p:VirtualCast}),
substantial structure is required to support it,
and provide features for exception handling and the standard library.

\subsection{Virtual Type}
A virtual type~(see \autoref{s:Virtuals}) has a pointer to a virtual table,
called the \emph{virtual-table pointer}, which binds an instance of a virtual
type to a virtual table.  Internally, the field is called \snake{virtual_table}
and is fixed after construction.  This pointer is also the table's id and how
the system accesses the virtual table and the virtual members there. It is
always the first field in the structure so that its location is always known.
\todo{Talk about constructors for virtual types (after they are working).}

\subsection{Type Id}
Every virtual type needs a unique id, so that type ids can be compared for
equality, which checks if the types representation are the same, or used to
access the type's type information.  Here, uniqueness means within a program
composed of multiple translation units (TU), not uniqueness across all
programs.

One approach for program uniqueness is declaring a static declaration for each
type id, where the runtime storage address of that variable is guaranteed to be
unique during program execution. The type id storage can also be used for other
purposes.

The problem is that a type id may appear in multiple TUs that compose a
program, see \autoref{ss:VirtualTable}; hence in each TU, it must be declared
as external to prevent multiple definitions. However, the type id must actually
be declared in one of the TUs so the linker creates the storage.  Hence, the
problem becomes designating one TU to insert an actual type-id declaration. But
the \CFA compiler does not know the set of the translation units that compose a
program, because TUs can be compile separately, followed by a separate link
step.

The solution is to mimic a \CFA feature in \Cpp{17}, @inline@ variables and
function:
\begin{quote}
There may be more than one definition of an inline function or variable (since
\Cpp{17} in the program as long as each definition appears in a different
translation unit and (for non-static inline functions and variables (since
\Cpp{17})) all definitions are identical. For example, an inline function or an
inline variable (since \Cpp{17}) may be defined in a header file that is
@#include@'d in multiple source files.~\cite{C++17}
\end{quote}
The underlying mechanism to provide this capability is attribute
\begin{cfa}
section(".gnu.linkonce.NAME")
\end{cfa}
where @NAME@ is the variable/function name duplicated in each TU.  The linker than
provides the service of generating a single declaration (instance) across all
TUs, even if a program is linked incrementally.

C does not support this feature for @inline@, and hence, neither does \CFA.
Again, rather than implement a new @inline@ extension for \CFA, a temporary
solution for the exception handling is to add the following in \CFA.
\begin{lstlisting}[language=CFA,{moredelim=**[is][\color{red}]{@}{@}}]
@__attribute__((cfa_linkonce))@ void f() {}
\end{lstlisting}
which becomes
\begin{lstlisting}[language=CFA,{moredelim=**[is][\color{red}]{@}{@}}]
__attribute__((section(".gnu.linkonce._X1fFv___1"))) void @_X1fFv___1@(){}
\end{lstlisting}
where @NAME@ from above is the \CFA mangled variable/function name.  Note,
adding this feature is necessary because, when using macros, the mangled name
is unavailable.  This attribute is useful for purposes other than exception
handling, and should eventually be rolled into @inline@ processing in \CFA.

Finally, a type id's data implements a pointers to the type's type information
instance.  Dereferencing the pointer gets the type information.

\subsection{Implementation}

The type information currently is only the parent's type id or, if the
type has no parent, the null pointer.
The ancestors of a virtual type are found by traversing type ids through
the type information.
An example using helper macros looks like:
\begin{cfa}
struct INFO_TYPE(TYPE) {
	INFO_TYPE(PARENT) const * parent;
};

__attribute__((cfa_linkonce))
INFO_TYPE(TYPE) const INFO_NAME(TYPE) = {
	&INFO_NAME(PARENT),
};
\end{cfa}

The type information is constructed as follows:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
Use the type's name to generate a name for the type information structure,
which is saved so it can be reused.
\item
Generate a new structure definition to store the type
information. The layout is the same in each case, just the parent's type id,
but the types used change from instance to instance.
The generated name is used for both this structure and, if relevant, the
parent pointer.
If the virtual type is polymorphic then the type information structure is
polymorphic as well, with the same polymorphic arguments.
\item
A separate name for instances is generated from the type's name.
\item
The definition is generated and initialized.
The parent id is set to the null pointer or to the address of the parent's
type information instance. Name resolution handles the rest.
\item
\CFA's name mangler does its regular name mangling encoding the type of
the declaration into the instance name. This process gives a program unique name
including different instances of the same polymorphic type.
\end{enumerate}
\todo{The list is making me realize, some of this isn't ordered.}


\begin{comment}
\subsubsection{\lstinline{cfa\_linkonce} Attribute}
% I just realized: This is an extension of the inline keyword.
% An extension of C's at least, it is very similar to C++'s.
Another feature added to \CFA is a new attribute: \texttt{cfa\_linkonce}.
This attribute is attached to an object or function definition
(any global declaration with a name and a type)
allowing it to be defined multiple times.
All matching definitions mush have the link-once attribute
and their implementations should be identical as well.

A single definition with the attribute can be included in a header
file as if it was a forward declaration, except no definition is required.

This technique is used for type-id instances. A link-once definition is
generated each time the structure is seen. This will result in multiple
copies but the link-once attribute ensures all but one are removed for a
unique instance.

Internally, @cfa_linkonce@ is replaced with
@section(".gnu.linkonce.NAME")@ where \texttt{NAME} is replaced by the
mangled name of the object.
Any other @section@ attributes are removed from the declaration.
The prefix \texttt{.gnu.linkonce} in section names is recognized by the
linker. If two of these sections appear with the same name, including
everything that comes after the special prefix, then only one is used
and the other is discarded.
\end{comment}


\subsection{Virtual Table}
\label{ss:VirtualTable}
Each virtual type has a virtual table type that stores its type id and
virtual members.
Each virtual type instance is bound to a table instance that is filled with
the values of virtual members.
Both the layout of the fields and their value are decided by the rules given
below.

The layout always comes in three parts.
\todo{Add labels to the virtual table layout figure.}
The first section is just the type id at the head of the table. It is always
there to ensure that it can be found even when the accessing code does not
know which virtual type it has.
The second section are all the virtual members of the parent, in the same
order as they appear in the parent's virtual table. Note that the type may
change slightly as references to the ``this" will change. This is limited to
inside pointers/references and via function pointers so that the size (and
hence the offsets) are the same.
The third section is similar to the second except that it is the new virtual
members introduced at this level in the hierarchy.

\begin{figure}
\input{vtable-layout}
\caption{Virtual Table Layout}
\label{f:VirtualTableLayout}
\todo*{Improve the Virtual Table Layout diagram.}
\end{figure}

The first and second sections together mean that every virtual table has a
prefix that has the same layout and types as its parent virtual table.
This, combined with the fixed offset to the virtual-table pointer, means that
for any virtual type, it is always safe to access its virtual table and,
from there, it is safe to check the type id to identify the exact type of the
underlying object, access any of the virtual members and pass the object to
any of the method-like virtual members.

When a virtual table is declared, the user decides where to declare it and its
name. The initialization of the virtual table is entirely automatic based on
the context of the declaration.

The type id is always fixed; with each virtual table type having
exactly one possible type id.
The virtual members are usually filled in by type resolution.
The best match for a given name and type at the declaration site is used.
There are two exceptions to that rule: the @size@ field, the type's size,
is set using a @sizeof@ expression and the @align@ field, the
type's alignment, is set using an @alignof@ expression.

\subsection{Concurrency Integration}
Coroutines and threads need instances of @CoroutineCancelled@ and
@ThreadCancelled@ respectively to use all of their functionality. When a new
data type is declared with @coroutine@ or @thread@, a forward declaration for
the instance is created as well. The definition of the virtual table is created
at the definition of the main function.

These transformations are shown through code re-writing in
\autoref{f:CoroutineTypeTransformation} and
\autoref{f:CoroutineMainTransformation} for a coroutine and a thread is similar.
In both cases, the original declaration is not modified, only new ones are
added.

\begin{figure}
\begin{cfa}
coroutine Example {
	// fields
};
\end{cfa}

\transformline[appends...]

\begin{cfa}
__attribute__((cfa_linkonce))
struct __cfatid_struct_CoroutineCancelled(Example)
		__cfatid_CoroutineCancelled = {
	&EXCEPTION_TYPE_ID,
};
extern CoroutineCancelled_vtable _default_vtable_object_declaration;
extern CoroutineCancelled_vtable & _default_vtable;
\end{cfa}
\caption{Coroutine Type Transformation}
\label{f:CoroutineTypeTransformation}
%\end{figure}

\bigskip

%\begin{figure}
\begin{cfa}
void main(Example & this) {
	// body
}
\end{cfa}

\transformline[appends...]

\begin{cfa}
CoroutineCancelled_vtable _default_vtable_object_declaration = {
	__cfatid_CoroutineCancelled,
	// Virtual member initialization.
};

CoroutineCancelled_vtable & _default_vtable =
	&_default_vtable_object_declaration;
\end{cfa}
\caption{Coroutine Main Transformation}
\label{f:CoroutineMainTransformation}
\end{figure}

\subsection{Virtual Cast}
Virtual casts are implemented as a function call that does the subtype check
and a C coercion-cast to do the type conversion.
% The C-cast is just to make sure the generated code is correct so the rest of
% the section is about that function.
The function is implemented in the standard library and has the following
signature:
\begin{cfa}
void * __cfa__virtual_cast(
	struct __cfavir_type_td parent,
	struct __cfavir_type_id const * child );
\end{cfa}
The type id for the target type of the virtual cast is passed in as @parent@ and
the cast target is passed in as @child@.
The generated C code wraps both arguments and the result with type casts.
There is also an internal check inside the compiler to make sure that the
target type is a virtual type.
% It also checks for conflicting definitions.

The virtual cast either returns the original pointer or the null pointer
as the new type.
So the function does the parent check and returns the appropriate value.
The parent check is a simple linear search of child's ancestors using the
type information.

\section{Exceptions}
\todo{Anything about exception construction.}

\section{Unwinding}
% Adapt the unwind chapter, just describe the sections of libunwind used.
% Mention that termination and cancellation use it. Maybe go into why
% resumption doesn't as well.

% Many modern languages work with an internal stack that function push and pop
% their local data to. Stack unwinding removes large sections of the stack,
% often across functions.

Stack unwinding is the process of removing stack frames (activations) from the
stack. On function entry and return, unwinding is handled directly by the
call/return code embedded in the function.
\PAB{Meaning: In many cases, the position of the instruction pointer (relative to parameter
and local declarations) is enough to know the current size of the stack
frame.}

Usually, the stack-frame size is known statically based on parameter and
local variable declarations. Even for a dynamic stack-size, the information
to determine how much of the stack has to be removed is still contained
within the function.
Allocating/deallocating stack space is usually an $O(1)$ operation achieved by
bumping the hardware stack-pointer up or down as needed.
Constructing/destructing values within a stack frame has
a similar complexity but larger constants, which takes longer.

Unwinding across multiple stack frames is more complex because that
information is no longer contained within the current function.
With separate compilation a function does not know its callers nor their frame size.
In general, the caller's frame size is embedded only at the functions entry (push
stack) and exit (pop stack).
Without altering the main code path it is also hard to pass that work off
to the caller.

The traditional unwinding mechanism for C is implemented by saving a snap-shot
of a function's state with @setjmp@ and restoring that snap-shot with
@longjmp@. This approach bypasses the need to know stack details by simply
reseting to a snap-shot of an arbitrary but existing function frame on the
stack. It is up to the programmer to ensure the snap-shot is valid when it is
reset and that all required clean-up from the unwound stacks is performed.
This approach is fragile and requires extra work in the surrounding code.

With respect to the extra work in the surrounding code,
many languages define clean-up actions that must be taken when certain
sections of the stack are removed. Such as when the storage for a variable
is removed from the stack (destructor call) or when a try statement with a finally clause is
(conceptually) popped from the stack.
None of these cases should be handled by the user --- that would contradict the
intention of these features --- so they need to be handled automatically.

To safely remove sections of the stack, the language must be able to find and
run these clean-up actions even when removing multiple functions unknown at
the beginning of the unwinding.

One of the most popular tools for stack management is libunwind, a low-level
library that provides tools for stack walking, handler execution, and
unwinding. What follows is an overview of all the relevant features of
libunwind needed for this work, and how \CFA uses them to implement exception
handling.

\subsection{libunwind Usage}
Libunwind, accessed through @unwind.h@ on most platforms, is a C library that
provides \Cpp-style stack-unwinding. Its operation is divided into two phases:
search and cleanup. The dynamic target search -- phase 1 -- is used to scan the
stack and decide where unwinding should stop (but no unwinding occurs). The
cleanup -- phase 2 -- does the unwinding and also runs any cleanup code.

To use libunwind, each function must have a personality function and a Language
Specific Data Area (LSDA). The LSDA has the unique information for each
function to tell the personality function where a function is executing, its
current stack frame, and what handlers should be checked. Theoretically, the
LSDA can contain any information but conventionally it is a table with entries
representing regions of a function and what has to be done there during
unwinding. These regions are bracketed by instruction addresses. If the
instruction pointer is within a region's start/end, then execution is currently
executing in that region. Regions are used to mark out the scopes of objects
with destructors and try blocks.

% Libunwind actually does very little, it simply moves down the stack from
% function to function. Most of the actions are implemented by the personality
% function which libunwind calls on every function. Since this is shared across
% many functions or even every function in a language it will need a bit more
% information.

The GCC compilation flag @-fexceptions@ causes the generation of an LSDA and
attaches a personality function to each function.
In plain C (which \CFA currently compiles down to) this
flag only handles the cleanup attribute:
\begin{cfa}
void clean_up( int * var ) { ... }
int avar __attribute__(( cleanup(clean_up) ));
\end{cfa}
The attribute is used on a variable and specifies a function,
in this case @clean_up@, run when the variable goes out of scope.
This feature is enough to mimic destructors,
but not try statements that affect
the unwinding.

To get full unwinding support, all of these features must be handled directly
in assembly and assembler directives; particularly the cfi directives
\snake{.cfi_lsda} and \snake{.cfi_personality}.

\subsection{Personality Functions}
Personality functions have a complex interface specified by libunwind. This
section covers some of the important parts of the interface.

A personality function can perform different actions depending on how it is
called.
\begin{lstlisting}
typedef _Unwind_Reason_Code (*_Unwind_Personality_Fn) (
	_Unwind_Action action,
	_Unwind_Exception_Class exception_class,
	_Unwind_Exception * exception,
	struct _Unwind_Context * context);
\end{lstlisting}
The @action@ argument is a bitmask of possible actions:
\begin{enumerate}[topsep=5pt]
\item
@_UA_SEARCH_PHASE@ specifies a search phase and tells the personality function
to check for handlers. If there is a handler in a stack frame, as defined by
the language, the personality function returns @_URC_HANDLER_FOUND@; otherwise
it return @_URC_CONTINUE_UNWIND@.

\item
@_UA_CLEANUP_PHASE@ specifies a cleanup phase, where the entire frame is
unwound and all cleanup code is run. The personality function does whatever
cleanup the language defines (such as running destructors/finalizers) and then
generally returns @_URC_CONTINUE_UNWIND@.

\item
\begin{sloppypar}
@_UA_HANDLER_FRAME@ specifies a cleanup phase on a function frame that found a
handler. The personality function must prepare to return to normal code
execution and return @_URC_INSTALL_CONTEXT@.
\end{sloppypar}

\item
@_UA_FORCE_UNWIND@ specifies a forced unwind call. Forced unwind only performs
the cleanup phase and uses a different means to decide when to stop
(see \autoref{s:ForcedUnwind}).
\end{enumerate}

The @exception_class@ argument is a copy of the
\code{C}{exception}'s @exception_class@ field,
which is a number that identifies the EHM
that created the exception.

The \code{C}{exception} argument is a pointer to a user
provided storage object. It has two public fields: the @exception_class@,
which is described above, and the @exception_cleanup@ function.
The clean-up function is used by the EHM to clean-up the exception, if it
should need to be freed at an unusual time, it takes an argument that says
why it had to be cleaned up.

The @context@ argument is a pointer to an opaque type passed to helper
functions called inside the personality function.

The return value, @_Unwind_Reason_Code@, is an enumeration of possible messages
that can be passed several places in libunwind. It includes a number of
messages for special cases (some of which should never be used by the
personality function) and error codes. However, unless otherwise noted, the
personality function always returns @_URC_CONTINUE_UNWIND@.

\subsection{Raise Exception}
Raising an exception is the central function of libunwind and it performs
two-staged unwinding.
\begin{cfa}
_Unwind_Reason_Code _Unwind_RaiseException(_Unwind_Exception *);
\end{cfa}
First, the function begins the search phase, calling the personality function
of the most recent stack frame. It continues to call personality functions
traversing the stack from newest to oldest until a function finds a handler or
the end of the stack is reached. In the latter case, raise exception returns
@_URC_END_OF_STACK@.

Second, when a handler is matched, raise exception moves to the clean-up
phase and walks the stack a second time.
Once again, it calls the personality functions of each stack frame from newest
to oldest. This pass stops at the stack frame containing the matching handler.
If that personality function has not install a handler, it is an error.

If an error is encountered, raise exception returns either
@_URC_FATAL_PHASE1_ERROR@ or @_URC_FATAL_PHASE2_ERROR@ depending on when the
error occurred.

\subsection{Forced Unwind}
\label{s:ForcedUnwind}
Forced Unwind is the other central function in libunwind.
\begin{cfa}
_Unwind_Reason_Code _Unwind_ForcedUnwind(_Unwind_Exception *,
	_Unwind_Stop_Fn, void *);
\end{cfa}
It also unwinds the stack but it does not use the search phase. Instead another
function, the stop function, is used to stop searching. The exception is the
same as the one passed to raise exception. The extra arguments are the stop
function and the stop parameter. The stop function has a similar interface as a
personality function, except it is also passed the stop parameter.
\begin{lstlisting}
typedef _Unwind_Reason_Code (*_Unwind_Stop_Fn)(
	_Unwind_Action action,
	_Unwind_Exception_Class exception_class,
	_Unwind_Exception * exception,
	struct _Unwind_Context * context,
	void * stop_parameter);
\end{lstlisting}

The stop function is called at every stack frame before the personality
function is called and then once more after all frames of the stack are
unwound.

Each time it is called, the stop function should return @_URC_NO_REASON@ or
transfer control directly to other code outside of libunwind. The framework
does not provide any assistance here.

\begin{sloppypar}
Its arguments are the same as the paired personality function. The actions
\snake{_UA_CLEANUP_PHASE} and \snake{_UA_FORCE_UNWIND} are always set when it is
called. Beyond the libunwind standard, both GCC and Clang add an extra action
on the last call at the end of the stack: \snake{_UA_END_OF_STACK}.
\end{sloppypar}

\section{Exception Context}
% Should I have another independent section?
% There are only two things in it, top_resume and current_exception. How it is
% stored changes depending on whether or not the thread-library is linked.

The exception context is global storage used to maintain data across different
exception operations and to communicate among different components.

Each stack must have its own exception context. In a sequential \CFA program,
there is only one stack with a single global exception-context. However, when
the library @libcfathread@ is linked, there are multiple stacks and each
needs its own exception context.

An exception context is retrieved by calling the function
\snake{this_exception_context}.
For sequential execution, this function is defined as
a weak symbol in the \CFA system-library, @libcfa@. When a \CFA program is
concurrent, it links with @libcfathread@, where this function is defined with a
strong symbol replacing the sequential version.

The sequential @this_exception_context@ returns a hard-coded pointer to the
global exception context.
The concurrent version adds the exception context to the data stored at the
base of each stack. When @this_exception_context@ is called, it retrieves the
active stack and returns the address of the context saved there.

\section{Termination}
% Memory management & extra information, the custom function used to implement
% catches. Talk about GCC nested functions.

\CFA termination exceptions use libunwind heavily because they match
\Cpp exceptions closely. The main complication for \CFA is that the
compiler generates C code, making it very difficult to generate the assembly to
form the LSDA for try blocks or destructors.

\subsection{Memory Management}
The first step of a termination raise is to copy the exception into memory
managed by the exception system. Currently, the system uses @malloc@, rather
than reserved memory or the stack top. The EHM manages
memory for the exception as well as memory for libunwind and the system's own
per-exception storage.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\input{exception-layout}
\caption{Exception Layout}
\label{f:ExceptionLayout}
\end{figure}

Exceptions are stored in variable-sized blocks
(see \autoref{f:ExceptionLayout}).
The first component is a fixed-sized data structure that contains the
information for libunwind and the exception system. The second component is an
area of memory big enough to store the exception. Macros with pointer arthritic
and type cast are used to move between the components or go from the embedded
@_Unwind_Exception@ to the entire node.

Multiple exceptions can exist at the same time because exceptions can be
raised inside handlers, destructors and finally blocks.
Figure~\vref{f:MultipleExceptions} shows a program that has multiple
exceptions active at one time.
Each time an exception is thrown and caught the stack unwinds and the finally
clause runs. This handler throws another exception (until @num_exceptions@ gets
high enough), which must be allocated. The previous exceptions may not be
freed because the handler/catch clause has not been run.
Therefore, the EHM must keep all unhandled exceptions alive
while it allocates exceptions for new throws.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\newsavebox{\codeBox}
\newsavebox{\stackBox}
\begin{lrbox}{\codeBox}
\begin{lstlisting}[language=CFA,{moredelim=**[is][\color{red}]{@}{@}}]
unsigned num_exceptions = 0;
void throws() {
    try {
        try {
            ++num_exceptions;
            throw (Example){table};
        } finally {
            if (num_exceptions < 3) {
                throws();
            }
        }
    } catch (exception_t *) {
        --num_exceptions;
    }
}
int main() {
    throws();
}
\end{lstlisting}
\end{lrbox}

\begin{lrbox}{\stackBox}
\begin{lstlisting}
| try-finally
| try-catch (Example)
throws()
| try-finally
| try-catch (Example)
throws()
| try-finally
| try-catch (Example)
throws()
main()
\end{lstlisting}
\end{lrbox}

{\usebox\codeBox}
\hspace{25pt}
{\usebox\stackBox}

\caption{Multiple Exceptions}
\label{f:MultipleExceptions}
\end{figure}
\todo*{Work on multiple exceptions code sample.}

All exceptions are stored in nodes, which are then linked together in lists
one list per stack, with the
list head stored in the exception context. Within each linked list, the most
recently thrown exception is at the head followed by older thrown
exceptions. This format allows exceptions to be thrown, while a different
exception is being handled. The exception at the head of the list is currently
being handled, while other exceptions wait for the exceptions before them to be
handled and removed.

The virtual members in the exception's virtual table provide the size of the
exception, the copy function, and the free function, so they are specific to an
exception type. The size and copy function are used immediately to copy an
exception into managed memory. After the exception is handled, the free
function is used to clean up the exception and then the entire node is
passed to free, returning the memory back to the heap.

\subsection{Try Statements and Catch Clauses}
The try statement with termination handlers is complex because it must
compensate for the C code-generation versus proper
assembly-code generated from \CFA. Libunwind
requires an LSDA and personality function for control to unwind across a
function. The LSDA in particular is hard to mimic in generated C code.

The workaround is a function called @__cfaehm_try_terminate@ in the standard
\CFA library. The contents of a try block and the termination handlers are converted
into nested functions. These are then passed to the try terminate function and it
calls them, appropriately.
Because this function is known and fixed (and not an arbitrary function that
happens to contain a try statement), its LSDA can be generated ahead
of time.

Both the LSDA and the personality function for @__cfaehm_try_terminate@ are set ahead of time using
embedded assembly. This assembly code is handcrafted using C @asm@ statements
and contains
enough information for a single try statement the function represents.

The three functions passed to try terminate are:
\begin{description}
\item[try function:] This function is the try block, it is where all the code
from inside the try block is placed. It takes no parameters and has no
return value. This function is called during regular execution to run the try
block.

\item[match function:] This function is called during the search phase and
decides if a catch clause matches the termination exception. It is constructed
from the conditional part of each handler and runs each check, top to bottom,
in turn, first checking to see if the exception type matches.
The match is performed in two steps, first a virtual cast is used to see
if the raised exception is an instance of the declared exception or one of
its descendant type, and then is the condition true, if present.
It takes a pointer to the exception and returns 0 if the
exception is not handled here. Otherwise the return value is the id of the
handler that matches the exception.

\item[handler function:] This function handles the exception, and contains
all the code from the handlers in the try statement, joined with a switch
statement on the handler's id.
It takes a
pointer to the exception and the handler's id and returns nothing. It is called
after the cleanup phase.
\end{description}
All three functions are created with GCC nested functions. GCC nested functions
can be used to create closures,
in other words, functions that can refer to their lexical scope in other
functions on the stack when called. This approach allows the functions to refer to all the
variables in scope for the function containing the @try@ statement. These
nested functions and all other functions besides @__cfaehm_try_terminate@ in
\CFA use the GCC personality function and the @-fexceptions@ flag to generate
the LSDA.
Using this pattern, \CFA implements destructors with the cleanup attribute.

\autoref{f:TerminationTransformation} shows the pattern used to transform
a \CFA try statement with catch clauses into the appropriate C functions.
\todo{Explain the Termination Transformation figure.}

\begin{figure}
\begin{cfa}
try {
	// TRY BLOCK
} catch (Exception1 * name1 ; check(name1)) {
	// CATCH BLOCK 1
} catch (Exception2 * name2) {
	// CATCH BLOCK 2
}
\end{cfa}

\transformline

\begin{cfa}
void try(void) {
	// TRY BLOCK
}
int match(exception_t * __exception_inst) {
	{
		Exception1 * name1;
		if (name1 = (virtual Exception1 *)__exception_inst
				&& check(name1)) {
			return 1;
		}
	}
	{
		Exception2 * name2;
		if (name2 = (virtual Exception2 *)__exception_inst) {
			return 2;
		}
	}
	return 0;
}
void catch(exception_t * __exception_inst, int __handler_index) {
	switch (__handler_index) {
	case 1:
	{
		Exception1 * name1 = (virtual Exception1 *)__exception_inst;
		// CATCH BLOCK 1
	}
	return;
	case 2:
	{
		Exception2 * name2 = (virtual Exception2 *)__exception_inst;
		// CATCH BLOCK 2
	}
	return;
	}
}
{
	__cfaehm_try_terminate(try, catch, match);
}
\end{cfa}

\caption{Termination Transformation}
\label{f:TerminationTransformation}
\todo*{Improve (compress?) Termination Transformations.}
\end{figure}

\section{Resumption}
% The stack-local data, the linked list of nodes.

Resumption is simpler to implement than termination
because there is no stack unwinding.
Instead of storing the data in a special area using assembly,
there is just a linked list of possible handlers for each stack,
with each node on the list representing a try statement on the stack.

The head of the list is stored in the exception context.
The nodes are stored in order, with the more recent try statements closer
to the head of the list.
Instead of traversing the stack, resumption handling traverses the list.
At each node, the EHM checks to see if the try statement the node represents
can handle the exception. If it can, then the exception is handled and
the operation finishes, otherwise the search continues to the next node.
If the search reaches the end of the list without finding a try statement
that can handle the exception, the default handler is executed and the
operation finishes, unless it throws an exception.

Each node has a handler function that does most of the work.
The handler function is passed the raised exception and returns true
if the exception is handled and false otherwise.
The handler function checks each of its internal handlers in order,
top-to-bottom, until it funds a match. If a match is found that handler is
run, after which the function returns true, ignoring all remaining handlers.
If no match is found the function returns false.
The match is performed in two steps, first a virtual cast is used to see
if the raised exception is an instance of the declared exception or one of
its descendant type, and then is the condition true, if present.
\PAB{I don't understand this sentence.
This ordering gives the type guarantee used in the predicate.}

\autoref{f:ResumptionTransformation} shows the pattern used to transform
a \CFA try statement with catch clauses into the appropriate C functions.
\todo{Explain the Resumption Transformation figure.}

\begin{figure}
\begin{cfa}
try {
	// TRY BLOCK
} catchResume (Exception1 * name1 ; check(name1)) {
	// CATCH BLOCK 1
} catchResume (Exception2 * name2) {
	// CATCH BLOCK 2
}
\end{cfa}

\transformline

\begin{cfa}
bool handle(exception_t * __exception_inst) {
	{
		Exception1 * name1;
		if (name1 = (virtual Exception1 *)__exception_inst
				&& check(name1)) {
			// CATCH BLOCK 1
			return 1;
		}
	}
	{
		Exception2 * name2;
		if (name2 = (virtual Exception2 *)__exception_inst) {
			// CATCH BLOCK 2
			return 2;
		}
	}
	return false;
}
struct __try_resume_node __resume_node
	__attribute__((cleanup( __cfaehm_try_resume_cleanup )));
__cfaehm_try_resume_setup( &__resume_node, handler );
\end{cfa}

\caption{Resumption Transformation}
\label{f:ResumptionTransformation}
\todo*{Improve (compress?) Resumption Transformations.}
\end{figure}

% Recursive Resumption Stuff:
\autoref{f:ResumptionMarking} shows search skipping
(see \vpageref{s:ResumptionMarking}), which ignores parts of
the stack
already examined, and is accomplished by updating the front of the list as the
search continues. Before the handler is called at a matching node, the head of the list
is updated to the next node of the current node. After the search is complete,
successful or not, the head of the list is reset.
% No paragraph?
This mechanism means the current handler and every handler that has already
been checked are not on the list while a handler is run. If a resumption is
thrown during the handling of another resumption, the active handlers and all
the other handlers checked up to this point are not checked again.
% No paragraph?
This structure also supports new handlers added while the resumption is being
handled. These are added to the front of the list, pointing back along the
stack --- the first one points over all the checked handlers ---
and the ordering is maintained.

\begin{figure}
\centering
\input{resumption-marking}
\caption{Resumption Marking}
\label{f:ResumptionMarking}
\todo*{Label Resumption Marking to aid clarity.}
\end{figure}

\label{p:zero-cost}
Finally, the resumption implementation has a cost for entering/exiting a try
statement with @catchResume@ clauses, whereas a try statement with @catch@
clauses has zero-cost entry/exit. While resumption does not need the stack
unwinding and cleanup provided by libunwind, it could use the search phase to
providing zero-cost enter/exit using the LSDA. Unfortunately, there is no way
to return from a libunwind search without installing a handler or raising an
error. Although workarounds might be possible, they are beyond the scope of
this thesis. The current resumption implementation has simplicity in its
favour.
% Seriously, just compare the size of the two chapters and then consider
% that unwind is required knowledge for that chapter.

\section{Finally}
% Uses destructors and GCC nested functions.
\autoref{f:FinallyTransformation} shows the pattern used to transform a \CFA
try statement with finally clause into the appropriate C functions.
The finally clause is placed into a GCC nested-function
with a unique name, and no arguments or return values.  This nested function is
then set as the cleanup function of an empty object that is declared at the
beginning of a block placed around the context of the associated @try@
statement.

\begin{figure}
\begin{cfa}
try {
	// TRY BLOCK
} finally {
	// FINALLY BLOCK
}
\end{cfa}

\transformline

\begin{cfa}
{
	void finally(void *__hook){
		// FINALLY BLOCK
	}
	__attribute__ ((cleanup(finally)))
	struct __cfaehm_cleanup_hook __finally_hook;
	{
		// TRY BLOCK
	}

}
\end{cfa}

\caption{Finally Transformation}
\label{f:FinallyTransformation}
\end{figure}

The rest is handled by GCC. The try block and all handlers are inside this
block. At completion, control exits the block and the empty object is cleaned
up, which runs the function that contains the finally code.

\section{Cancellation}
% Stack selections, the three internal unwind functions.

Cancellation also uses libunwind to do its stack traversal and unwinding,
however it uses a different primary function: @_Unwind_ForcedUnwind@. Details
of its interface can be found in the Section~\vref{s:ForcedUnwind}.

The first step of cancellation is to find the cancelled stack and its type:
coroutine, thread, or main thread.
In \CFA, a thread (the construct the user works with) is a user-level thread
(point of execution) paired with a coroutine, the thread's main coroutine.
The thread library also stores pointers to the main thread and the current
coroutine.
If the current thread's main and current coroutines are the same then the
current stack is a thread stack, otherwise it is a coroutine stack.
If the current stack is a thread stack, it is also the main thread stack
if and only if the main and current threads are the same.

However, if the threading library is not linked, the sequential execution is on
the main stack. Hence, the entire check is skipped because the weak-symbol
function is loaded. Therefore, main thread cancellation is unconditionally
performed.

Regardless of how the stack is chosen, the stop function and parameter are
passed to the forced-unwind function. The general pattern of all three stop
functions is the same: continue unwinding until the end of stack and
then perform the appropriate transfer.

For main stack cancellation, the transfer is just a program abort.

For coroutine cancellation, the exception is stored on the coroutine's stack,
and the coroutine context switches to its last resumer. The rest is handled on
the backside of the resume, which checks if the resumed coroutine is
cancelled. If cancelled, the exception is retrieved from the resumed coroutine,
and a @CoroutineCancelled@ exception is constructed and loaded with the
cancelled exception. It is then resumed as a regular exception with the default
handler coming from the context of the resumption call.

For thread cancellation, the exception is stored on the thread's main stack and
then context switched to the scheduler. The rest is handled by the thread
joiner. When the join is complete, the joiner checks if the joined thread is
cancelled. If cancelled, the exception is retrieved and the joined thread, and
a @ThreadCancelled@ exception is constructed and loaded with the cancelled
exception. The default handler is passed in as a function pointer. If it is
null (as it is for the auto-generated joins on destructor call), the default is
used, which is a program abort.
%; which gives the required handling on implicate join.